Neither GAL CDU still had six years' primary school in their election platforms, the GAL, the nine years of joint learning. The CDU leadership abandoned its long-standing principles in the school's policy in favor of another power option with the GAL. The result was a compromise, the six years of primary school.
suggested against that school reform is very late and resistance in the CDU.
The former CDU-position made the civil initiative "We want to get" politically effective by they initiated a petition with about 184 000 votes surprisingly successfully completed.
now burned in the Senate, "the cottage". The newspapers published by Springer-Verlag feared the failure of Mr von Beust, if the upcoming referendum would be successful.
The mayor came up with the idea with Mr. Otto a respected representative of the Hamburg bourgeoisie to appoint a moderator. In my view, more of a tactical suggestion.
Mr. Otto, education policy has not yet emerged, has become of the CDU / GAL compromise and the position of the People's Initiative compromise proposals developed, he has been negotiating with both sides. What should be the only one educational policy for vegetables, only because the Senate wants to avoid a clear decision and the associated risks. Who will cost the new compromise proposals and disadvantage?
are clear better decisions or better yet the realization that the Hamburg school system and the school authorities could be overwhelmed by this reform.