in Hamburg came to the school system in recent decades, a variety of large and small reforms some successfully. A portion was used to profile the KMK, a part encouraged the establishment cone, the comprehensive school reform created after all and a great overall education, where many children came in addition to the school, which created but also with its competition to the three-tiered school system for counter-productive friction. Many reforms have had adverse reactions that were not thought of that. The fact that the comprehensive schools and secondary schools, such a high rate of pupils reached no conclusion was made by the school board, the so-called experts, school leaders, teacher associations and the media kept under cover when they knew it then.
As little was discussed in public is still a lack of permeability of the Hamburg school system.
The poor level of performance to date in PISA studies demonstrated sustained by some insiders quite early Sun estimated speaks against the reform capacity of the Hamburg school system.
There must Ruppersberg Veit, Peter-Ulrich Meyer, they are not a bad journalist, interviewed among others the wrong people, or have not asked the right questions.
If today the men and de Lorent Vieluf plan under the direction of Mrs. Goetsch (GAL) to reform the grand style, moderately supported by the GEW, while the former reformer in the school board, also GEW close as Peter Daschner, but now even those conservative blank are eliminated or only the background music playing, then you should cherish the utmost doubt whether schools and school authorities with limited resources have sufficient Erfolgsausssichten to introduce the six-year primary school and, thereby, performance and transparency to promote the schools.
A positive "evaluation" would be accompanied or after the problem.
.
0 comments:
Post a Comment