on my weblogs I have the alleged search for a compromise and the Chaired by Michael Otto from the start as more tactical maneuvers evaluated, the result must be foreseeable in doubt by the scope for negotiation on both sides. The press conference of the ruling coalition today I was really in it only confirms. It went for days already the best position for the referendum-election campaign.
Mandatory introduction of the six-year primary school would not have been covered by the mandate of the referendum. The introduction of binding to the decision of a commission of experts, already was a daring idea. It has not surprised me that particularly the GAL has ultimately not a true evaluation prior to the introduction of the six-year primary school agreed. Who knows, the Hamburg school system with its many health-related characteristics and the recent PIRLS, PISA and learning original investigations, will understand that.
virtually sat on the negotiating table, the newspapers of the Springer-Verlag in which is well known that they wanted an agreement. Of course this is only the experts of the Hamburg system of government been so deliberately, because these influential papers have so far had no referendum enforced or prevented.
But anyone who reads the Hamburger Abendblatt today, one finds confirmation for this view:
On the first page appears in the red robes of the constitutional judges equal to the lead story with the headline: "Beust and Goetsch expected today, with failure the school calls "and in the Hamburg section, page 14, following an extensive interview with the two mayors under the title" Frustrated and determined. "
should be shown the people's initiative "We want to learn" before the sixth round of negotiations, can be given in what way the government a forum for their position, and this means with a view to a possible school political campaign?
0 comments:
Post a Comment